March 3, 2008

You are OK, I am OK !!!!

Was Initially a bit apprehensive about writing an article on WiMAX because of the sheer number of WiMAX experts around me but somehow gathered courage to air my views on it. Few years ago sometime during the dotcom boom, Gartner coined a terminology, "Hype Cycle" to explain the over-enthusiasm and the following disappointment that typically occurs with new technologies. The 5 phases of the Hype Cycle starts with technology breakthrough followed by over inflated expectations of the technology and then a period of disillusionment, where the technology & the user expectations synchronize which lead to further experimentation into the practical applications of the technology and finally the last phase of the hype cycle where the benefits of technology become widely accepted.
If WiMAX, as a technology were to be mapped to the Hype Cycle, my guess is that it would be firmly entrenched in the third phase, the period of disillusionment. It was all good news on WiMAX front, until the poster boys of WiMAX vendors worldwide, Sprint & Clearwire decided to call off their venture due to complexities in the partnership but i believe the problems started after a "WiMAX friendly" sprint CEO quit owing to investor pressures. This was followed by good news on two fronts for WiMAX. First, it being categorised as a 3G technology (Is it actually good news ?? Were'nt they targeting 4G) and the auction of 700 MHz spectrum.
But Sprint's problems continued and they still persist. Last week in its Quarterly results, Sprint reported a loss of over 29Bn dollars and it also revised downward its guidance for next few quarters and asked its investors not to expect any dividends in the foreseeable future. Although this was attributed to goodwill write-off's following Nextel purchase. But i believe, the reasons behind the loss are far more complex. On one side, Sprint is failing to stem the subscriber churn(mostly in the high ARPU postpaid segment), on the other it has already committed huge sums of cash for WiMAX deployment. It is yet to fully start realizing the synergies out of Nextel merger and the competition is one-up over sprint when it comes to understanding the market. Recently, almost all major operators introduced unlimited Voice, text and Data for $99 and this idea as per some industry sources was sprint's brainchild (Sprint was the last among the "big 4" to launch the unlimited "Simply Everything" plan behind AT&T, Verizon & T-Mobile). Last year the vendors committed dual CDMA/WiMAX phones in the market by early 2008 but there is not much news on that front yet. All this apart, WiMAX's main competitor LTE is capturing a lot of news space lately with successes in its latest round of trails. It is continuously adding Service providers across the world in its "backers" list and the fact that it represents a more natural evolution from 3G to 4G is helping its cause multi-fold. Although WiMAX will have the time to market advantage over LTE, delays in certifications by WiMAX forum coupled with network rollout delays will substantially narrow its Window of opportunity.
Although the need of the hour is a clean-up of its core Wireless business, i believe the future success of sprint almost solely rests on its WiMAX investment. What kind of Business risk is the company embracing when all eggs are put in a single basket ?? Clearwire on its part sensed trouble early and moved out of the JV. Clearwire is more a small and niche company and i believe a move out of the JV will actually help Clearwire in terms of financing from the major equipment vendors for WiMAX deployment although there is a talk that it has massively reduced the number of PoP's that originally committed to deploy during the initial phase. The WiMAX vendor trio of Intel, Motorola & Samsung have till date projected a very rosy picture of the technology but problems like high Capex, delays in certifications by the WiMAX forum and lack of interoperability with existing handsets is for everyone to see. What these vendors have to understand is whether real or perceived the future of WiMAX still rests heavily in Sprint's hands . Yes, WiMAX can and will survive without Sprint but at an entirely different level. Sprint was exactly what WiMAX needed when the technology was still in its initial phases back in 2006 and i don't think situation has changed much since then.

1 comment:

Saurabh Sharma said...

Saintly SPRINT !!

Saints are born with a purpose much beyond the usual human motives of existence. Joan of arc was born to free french from the english dominance. She commanded the nation's army at 17 was burned to death at 19 ,shunned by all, then found innocent and beatified by pope...she became the St. Joan of arc..reverred by french to this date

Sprint may also be beatified by Wimax forum some years down the line though their motives may not be that saintly. They wanted to be sooo ahead of competitors that they left their subscribers way behind !!...too foolish or too clever??

We are first movers..hey everyone wanted u to be...whilst the other operators were clever enough to evaluate all options : LTE,UMB,Wimax. sprint was too early into Wimax...jst what Wimax vendors wanted..I hope they donot end up being a guinea pig which died of too much experimentation by scientists..Reminds me of what Xerox did for Home PC market which they themselves could never monetize...

Ever heard 30+30=25...yes it happens...sprint has solved this equation..before merger both sprint and nextel had $30 bn market cap...the combined entity has only $ 25 Bn...Ever heard of negative synergies or shld i say "Desynergising"..hey i coined a new term..i will chk for copyrights !!

Now they are off the clearwire agreement..i think the subscriber churn they are seeing has forced them to off-load some of their Wimax committments.. i dont think they are completely off the wimax wagon..in fact they cannot de-board now with all the investments which they have already made..

Another mistake as u already said is to under-estimate LTE...think they thought it stood for " LATE TO EVOLVE"...but what they cldnt see was that it is fast to catch up too!..Wimax has the time to market advantage as of now but the winner in the end wont be a better technology per se..it would be the technology which develops a better business case for operators..the devices, ability to utilize existing infrastructure..this is where LTE has a strong chance of getting ahead..and with kind of support its getting from operators worldwide (verizon, vodafone, T-mobile, NTT, bharti??? )it can prove to be a real competing standard...will they ever converge..despite all the vendor & operator politics am very optimistic that a convergent standard will evolve..Subscribers cannot be discriminated for long on the basis of technology they opt for..ubiquitous broadband access--> Thats what we want..who cares whether its Wimax, Lte and UMB..Will operators understand this ..or shld i say WHEN will operators understand this

And regarding giving flip to Wimax..As i said earlier..when its telecom.."look eastwards"...The action is here guys...TATA's are committing $500 mn+ on wimax and so are other operators..South-asian markets are simply humongous opportunity for Wimax and other competing technologies due to low broadband penetration...Its happening and the playground is our on backyard..So lets stop looking westwards!!

Sprint Epitaph !!

Herein lies Sprint-nextel..His courage, determination and committment towards the social cause of Wimax allowed millions and millions of poor in the third world country to connect to world..Alas! he wasnt alive to see the flower in full bloom which he himself did sow..

May his soul rest in Peace..Amen